Welcome, Name

Recent Results

Drill - Reading
Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Drill - Reading
Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Drill - Reading
Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz

CONTENT REVIEW

Access the content review section link HERE.

Who Should Use This Course

This course is meant for students who are already generally comfortable with high school level course-work and want to take the next step to boost their SAT score to a high-performer level.

How to Use This Course

Note: This guide contains content review, a diagnostic exam, section strategy guides (click "read more" in the drill sections to access), and individual question type drills, followed by a practice exam and appendix. Read the section strategy guides ("read more") before doing each drill. Question subtype drills can only be completed once. If you start a drill but are interrupted / choose not to complete, press the back button on your browser to exit before submitting/running out of time and you will be able to start from scratch the next time you start the drill.

This guide is meant to be a high value-for-time resource. We will go over the basics of content first, and then question-specific strategies. Many other SAT prep books take 300+ pages to go over content, but miss out on many of the specific tactics that become important when aiming for a high score. The content section in this book is concise and potent – read through it first and do the section-specific practice questions until you are comfortable with the subject matter.

Knowing the content is fundamental   to achieving a high SAT score. With infinite time and preparation, almost anyone can become comfortable with the vast majority of the content. Your biggest enemy on the SAT is not the material, but the time pressure. Both the time crunch of answering 44 Writing questions in 35 minutes (for example) as well as the sheer endurance it takes to perform optimally over the course of a three hour test are major resource constraints. After you are familiar with the basic content of the exam, this book will take you through strategies and exercises focused on speeding up your answering process, and dealing with the inevitable questions that slip through gaps in your knowledge.

After you have a handle on both content and speed, the next most important part of test preparation is improving endurance. The best way to do this is by taking the official SAT practice tests, accessible through the CollegeBoard website. There are a plethora of third-party test prep resources offering their own practice exams. I have used many of them in the past. They are generally not 100% accurate depictions of the real exam and should preferably only be used if you need additional practice beyond the official papers. The online course associated with this guide contains practice tests that should simulate the questions types covered on the SAT. Even so, I would recommend you complete at least 1-2 official CollegeBoard practice exams before taking the SAT.

Recommended Process

1. Initial Content Review

2. Take Diagnostic Test (at least 1-2 days after Content Review work)

3. Drill content based on areas of difficulty on Diagnostic Test

4. Strategic Practice / Optimizing the Process

5. 1-3 Practice Tests to put it all together

Exam Structure

The Digital SAT (2024) will have two sections in the Reading & Writing category. Each section will be 27 questions long, with 32 minutes of allotted time. The module will start with Reading questions, which will involve textual analysis and some vocabulary. This will be followed by Grammar questions, which will test your understanding of English conventions and vocabulary. Finally, there will be 5-10 Semantics questions that will test your understanding of the content of sentences/passages rather than their structure.

There is no essay section on the standard Digital SAT, but some specific state-mandated version may include one (this is the vast minority). I have included an essay drill in this course for your benefit, and submissions will be reviewed/scored by a real instructor within 7 days.

The Digital SAT (2024) will have two sections in the Mathematics category. Each section will be 22 questions long, with 35 minutes of allotted time. The module will have 16-17 multiple-choice questions of the 22, and the rest will be Student Produced Responses where you must write your own answer. If your answer to a Student Produced Response is a fraction, write it in as an improper fraction (7/3) or as a decimal rounded to the fourth digit (2.333). Do NOT write it as a mixed number (2 1/3) or a decimal truncated too quickly (2.3). Write only the number – don’t include symbols like commas, %, or $. Questions in this section are ordered roughly according to the CollegeBoard’s view of their difficulty. You will have three sheets of scratch paper and can use your own pen and pencil. I highly recommend writing down each step for each question, even if it’s easy, as it helps with proofreading and avoiding silly mistakes. Calculators are permitted on every Math question unless stated otherwise, and the Digital SAT app includes a built-in calculator. The calculator should be similar to the one here (https://www.desmos.com/testing/cb-digital-sat/graphing).  Since there are trap answers, make sure you understand the logic of the question/answer before plugging numbers away.

There are four different broad content areas in the math section. They breakdown (per module) as follows:

• Algebra – 7-8 questions

• Advanced Math – 7-8 questions

• Problem-Solving and Data Analysis – 3-4 questions

• Geometry and Trigonometry – 3-4 questions

Diagnostic Exam

4 modules, total 2 hours 14 minutes
  • Reading/Grammar - 27 questions, 32 minute timer
  • Math - 22 questions, 35 minute timer
  • Reading/Grammar - 27 questions, 32 minute timer
  • Math - 22 questions, 35 minute timer
Begin Exam

Diagnostic Exam

Exam Completed
Score: Math: xx | Reading xx
Review Results

Reading Section

Data Visualization

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Fill-in-the-Blank Vocab

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Information Retrieval

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Inter-Text Response

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Main Purpose

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Grammar Section

Clauses

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Complete-the-Sentence

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Summaries

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Transitions

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Verbs, Nouns, and Modifiers

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Essay Practice Question 1

Prompt:

The default Digital SAT does NOT have an essay section. This portion of the guide is included for your benefit, and/or if you are taking one of the few specific state-mandated SAT versions that do require an essay section. Otherwise, this section is optional. Your responses will be viewed live and returned with feedback within 7 days.

"The New Untouchables
By Thomas L. Friedman
The New York Times, October 21, 2009

Last summer I attended a talk by Michelle Rhee, the dynamic chancellor of public schools in Washington. Just before the session began, a man came up, introduced himself as Todd Martin and whispered to me that what Rhee was about to speak about our struggling public schools was actually a critical, but unspoken, reason for the Great Recession.


There's something to that. While the subprime mortgage mess involved a huge ethical breakdown on Wall Street, it coincided with an education breakdown on Main Street precisely when technology and open borders were enabling so many more people to compete with Americans for middle-class jobs.


In our subprime era, we thought we could have the American dream a house and yard with nothing down. This version of the American dream was delivered not by improving education, productivity and savings, but by Wall Street alchemy and borrowed money from Asia.


A year ago, it all exploded. Now that we are picking up the pieces, we need to understand that it is not only our financial system that needs a reboot and an upgrade, but also our public school system. Otherwise, the jobless recovery won't be just a passing phase, but our future.


"Our education failure is the largest contributing factor to the decline of the American worker's global competitiveness, particularly at the middle and bottom ranges," argued Martin, a former global executive with PepsiCo and Kraft Europe and now an international investor. "This loss of competitiveness has weakened the American worker's production of wealth, precisely when technology brought global competition much closer to home. So over a decade, American workers have maintained their standard of living by borrowing and overconsuming vis-à-vis their real income. When the Great Recession wiped out all the credit and asset bubbles that made that overconsumption possible, it left too many American workers not only deeper in debt than ever, but out of a job and lacking the skills to compete globally."


This problem will be reversed only when the decline in worker competitiveness reverses when we create enough new jobs and educated workers that are worth, say, $40-an-hour compared with the global alternatives. If we don't, there's no telling how "jobless" this recovery will be.


A Washington lawyer friend recently told me about layoffs at his firm. I asked him who was getting axed. He said it was interesting: lawyers who were used to just showing up and having work handed to them were the first to go because with the bursting of the credit bubble, that flow of work just isn't there. But those who have the ability to imagine new services, new opportunities and new ways to recruit work were being retained. They are the new untouchables.


That is the key to understanding our full education challenge today. Those who are waiting for this recession to end so someone can again hand them work could have a long wait. Those with the imagination to make themselves untouchables to invent smarter ways to do old jobs, energy-saving ways to provide new services, new ways to attract old customers or new ways to combine existing technologies will thrive. Therefore, we not only need a higher percentage of our kids graduating from high school and college more education but we need more of them with the right education.

As the Harvard University labor expert Lawrence Katz explains it: "If you think about the labor market today, the top half of the college market, those with the high-end analytical and problem-solving skills who can compete on the world market or game the financial system or deal with new government regulations, have done great. But the bottom half of the top, those engineers and programmers working on more routine tasks and not actively engaged in developing new ideas or recombining existing technologies or thinking about what new customers want, have done poorly. They've been much more exposed to global competitors that make them easily substitutable."


Those at the high end of the bottom half high school grads in construction or manufacturing have been clobbered by global competition and immigration, added Katz. "But those who have some interpersonal skills the salesperson who can deal with customers face to face or the home contractor who can help you redesign your kitchen without going to an architect have done well."


Just being an average accountant, lawyer, contractor or assembly-line worker is not the ticket it used to be. As Daniel Pink, the author of "A Whole New Mind," puts it: In a world in which more and more average work can be done by a computer, robot or talented foreigner faster, cheaper "and just as well," vanilla doesn't cut it anymore. It's all about what chocolate sauce, whipped cream and cherry you can put on top. So our schools have a doubly hard task now not just improving reading, writing and arithmetic but entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity.


Bottom line: We're not going back to the good old days without fixing our schools as well as our banks."

Write an essay in which you explain how Friedman builds an argument to persuade his audience that flaws in the education system were a meaningful contributor the Great Recession and that schools must be improved to better the economy. In your essay, analyze how Friedman uses evidence, reasoning, and stylistic or persuasive elements to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage. Your essay should not explain whether you agree with Friedman’s claims, but rather explain how Friedman builds an argument to persuade his audience.

Enter your response here:

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
We will reach out via email with your results shortly.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

All essay questions completed

Your results will be in your inbox soon.

Essay Practice Question 2

Prompt:

The default Digital SAT does NOT have an essay section. This portion of the guide is included for your benefit, and/or if you are taking one of the few specific state-mandated SAT versions that do require an essay section. Otherwise, this section is optional. Your responses will be viewed live and returned with feedback within 7 days.

"The New Untouchables
By Thomas L. Friedman
The New York Times, October 21, 2009

Last summer I attended a talk by Michelle Rhee, the dynamic chancellor of public schools in Washington. Just before the session began, a man came up, introduced himself as Todd Martin and whispered to me that what Rhee was about to speak about our struggling public schools was actually a critical, but unspoken, reason for the Great Recession.


There's something to that. While the subprime mortgage mess involved a huge ethical breakdown on Wall Street, it coincided with an education breakdown on Main Street precisely when technology and open borders were enabling so many more people to compete with Americans for middle-class jobs.


In our subprime era, we thought we could have the American dream a house and yard with nothing down. This version of the American dream was delivered not by improving education, productivity and savings, but by Wall Street alchemy and borrowed money from Asia.


A year ago, it all exploded. Now that we are picking up the pieces, we need to understand that it is not only our financial system that needs a reboot and an upgrade, but also our public school system. Otherwise, the jobless recovery won't be just a passing phase, but our future.


"Our education failure is the largest contributing factor to the decline of the American worker's global competitiveness, particularly at the middle and bottom ranges," argued Martin, a former global executive with PepsiCo and Kraft Europe and now an international investor. "This loss of competitiveness has weakened the American worker's production of wealth, precisely when technology brought global competition much closer to home. So over a decade, American workers have maintained their standard of living by borrowing and overconsuming vis-à-vis their real income. When the Great Recession wiped out all the credit and asset bubbles that made that overconsumption possible, it left too many American workers not only deeper in debt than ever, but out of a job and lacking the skills to compete globally."


This problem will be reversed only when the decline in worker competitiveness reverses when we create enough new jobs and educated workers that are worth, say, $40-an-hour compared with the global alternatives. If we don't, there's no telling how "jobless" this recovery will be.


A Washington lawyer friend recently told me about layoffs at his firm. I asked him who was getting axed. He said it was interesting: lawyers who were used to just showing up and having work handed to them were the first to go because with the bursting of the credit bubble, that flow of work just isn't there. But those who have the ability to imagine new services, new opportunities and new ways to recruit work were being retained. They are the new untouchables.


That is the key to understanding our full education challenge today. Those who are waiting for this recession to end so someone can again hand them work could have a long wait. Those with the imagination to make themselves untouchables to invent smarter ways to do old jobs, energy-saving ways to provide new services, new ways to attract old customers or new ways to combine existing technologies will thrive. Therefore, we not only need a higher percentage of our kids graduating from high school and college more education but we need more of them with the right education.

As the Harvard University labor expert Lawrence Katz explains it: "If you think about the labor market today, the top half of the college market, those with the high-end analytical and problem-solving skills who can compete on the world market or game the financial system or deal with new government regulations, have done great. But the bottom half of the top, those engineers and programmers working on more routine tasks and not actively engaged in developing new ideas or recombining existing technologies or thinking about what new customers want, have done poorly. They've been much more exposed to global competitors that make them easily substitutable."


Those at the high end of the bottom half high school grads in construction or manufacturing have been clobbered by global competition and immigration, added Katz. "But those who have some interpersonal skills the salesperson who can deal with customers face to face or the home contractor who can help you redesign your kitchen without going to an architect have done well."


Just being an average accountant, lawyer, contractor or assembly-line worker is not the ticket it used to be. As Daniel Pink, the author of "A Whole New Mind," puts it: In a world in which more and more average work can be done by a computer, robot or talented foreigner faster, cheaper "and just as well," vanilla doesn't cut it anymore. It's all about what chocolate sauce, whipped cream and cherry you can put on top. So our schools have a doubly hard task now not just improving reading, writing and arithmetic but entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity.


Bottom line: We're not going back to the good old days without fixing our schools as well as our banks."

Write an essay in which you explain how Friedman builds an argument to persuade his audience that flaws in the education system were a meaningful contributor the Great Recession and that schools must be improved to better the economy. In your essay, analyze how Friedman uses evidence, reasoning, and stylistic or persuasive elements to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage. Your essay should not explain whether you agree with Friedman’s claims, but rather explain how Friedman builds an argument to persuade his audience.

Enter your response here:

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
We will reach out via email with your results shortly.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Essay Practice Question 3

Prompt:

The default Digital SAT does NOT have an essay section. This portion of the guide is included for your benefit, and/or if you are taking one of the few specific state-mandated SAT versions that do require an essay section. Otherwise, this section is optional. Your responses will be viewed live and returned with feedback within 7 days.

"The New Untouchables
By Thomas L. Friedman
The New York Times, October 21, 2009

Last summer I attended a talk by Michelle Rhee, the dynamic chancellor of public schools in Washington. Just before the session began, a man came up, introduced himself as Todd Martin and whispered to me that what Rhee was about to speak about our struggling public schools was actually a critical, but unspoken, reason for the Great Recession.


There's something to that. While the subprime mortgage mess involved a huge ethical breakdown on Wall Street, it coincided with an education breakdown on Main Street precisely when technology and open borders were enabling so many more people to compete with Americans for middle-class jobs.


In our subprime era, we thought we could have the American dream a house and yard with nothing down. This version of the American dream was delivered not by improving education, productivity and savings, but by Wall Street alchemy and borrowed money from Asia.


A year ago, it all exploded. Now that we are picking up the pieces, we need to understand that it is not only our financial system that needs a reboot and an upgrade, but also our public school system. Otherwise, the jobless recovery won't be just a passing phase, but our future.


"Our education failure is the largest contributing factor to the decline of the American worker's global competitiveness, particularly at the middle and bottom ranges," argued Martin, a former global executive with PepsiCo and Kraft Europe and now an international investor. "This loss of competitiveness has weakened the American worker's production of wealth, precisely when technology brought global competition much closer to home. So over a decade, American workers have maintained their standard of living by borrowing and overconsuming vis-à-vis their real income. When the Great Recession wiped out all the credit and asset bubbles that made that overconsumption possible, it left too many American workers not only deeper in debt than ever, but out of a job and lacking the skills to compete globally."


This problem will be reversed only when the decline in worker competitiveness reverses when we create enough new jobs and educated workers that are worth, say, $40-an-hour compared with the global alternatives. If we don't, there's no telling how "jobless" this recovery will be.


A Washington lawyer friend recently told me about layoffs at his firm. I asked him who was getting axed. He said it was interesting: lawyers who were used to just showing up and having work handed to them were the first to go because with the bursting of the credit bubble, that flow of work just isn't there. But those who have the ability to imagine new services, new opportunities and new ways to recruit work were being retained. They are the new untouchables.


That is the key to understanding our full education challenge today. Those who are waiting for this recession to end so someone can again hand them work could have a long wait. Those with the imagination to make themselves untouchables to invent smarter ways to do old jobs, energy-saving ways to provide new services, new ways to attract old customers or new ways to combine existing technologies will thrive. Therefore, we not only need a higher percentage of our kids graduating from high school and college more education but we need more of them with the right education.

As the Harvard University labor expert Lawrence Katz explains it: "If you think about the labor market today, the top half of the college market, those with the high-end analytical and problem-solving skills who can compete on the world market or game the financial system or deal with new government regulations, have done great. But the bottom half of the top, those engineers and programmers working on more routine tasks and not actively engaged in developing new ideas or recombining existing technologies or thinking about what new customers want, have done poorly. They've been much more exposed to global competitors that make them easily substitutable."


Those at the high end of the bottom half high school grads in construction or manufacturing have been clobbered by global competition and immigration, added Katz. "But those who have some interpersonal skills the salesperson who can deal with customers face to face or the home contractor who can help you redesign your kitchen without going to an architect have done well."


Just being an average accountant, lawyer, contractor or assembly-line worker is not the ticket it used to be. As Daniel Pink, the author of "A Whole New Mind," puts it: In a world in which more and more average work can be done by a computer, robot or talented foreigner faster, cheaper "and just as well," vanilla doesn't cut it anymore. It's all about what chocolate sauce, whipped cream and cherry you can put on top. So our schools have a doubly hard task now not just improving reading, writing and arithmetic but entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity.


Bottom line: We're not going back to the good old days without fixing our schools as well as our banks."

Write an essay in which you explain how Friedman builds an argument to persuade his audience that flaws in the education system were a meaningful contributor the Great Recession and that schools must be improved to better the economy. In your essay, analyze how Friedman uses evidence, reasoning, and stylistic or persuasive elements to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage. Your essay should not explain whether you agree with Friedman’s claims, but rather explain how Friedman builds an argument to persuade his audience.

Enter your response here:

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
We will reach out via email with your results shortly.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Reading Section

Advanced Math

Absolute Value, Radical, and Rational

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Exponential

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Polynomial

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Quadratics

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Algebra

Linear Equations in 1 Variable

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Linear Equations in 2 Variables

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Linear Functions

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Linear Inequalities in 1 or 2 variables

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Systems of 2 Linear Equations in 2 Variables

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Geometry and Trigonometry

Area and Volume Formulas

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Circles

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Lines, angles, and triangles

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Right Triangles and Trigonometry

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Problem Solving

Evaluating Statistical Claims: Observational Studies and Experiments

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Inference from Sample Statistics and Margin of Error

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

One Variable Data - distributions and measures of center/spread

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Percentages

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Probability and Conditional Probability

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Ratios, rates, proportional relationships, and units

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Two-variable Data: models and Scatterplots

Drill Score: XX%
|
Review Quiz
Begin Quiz

Practice Exam

4 modules, total 2 hours 14 minutes
  • Reading/Grammar - 27 questions, 32 minute timer
  • Math - 22 questions, 35 minute timer
  • Reading/Grammar - 27 questions, 32 minute timer
  • Math - 22 questions, 35 minute timer
Begin Exam

Practice Exam

Exam Completed
Score: Math: xx | Reading xx
Review Results

APPENDIX

The Appendix contains answers to Tactical Exercises and the full 1000-word Vocab List.

Access the appendix section link HERE

Login to access profile

Login
Loading...